May 29, 2010

Back to Sukkur

I went back to Sukkur for another mission. This time, I got to spend a few days there.

One of things that I was asked to do was to attend a formal ceremony at which we were fed a boxed lunch. The box is actually a recycled cereal box, and when you open it you see what was formerly on the outside. This is the second time that it's happened, so I suspect that it's common practice.
There is an old fort on the Indus River in Sukkur, it's on an island and so the river looks only half as wide as it normally is. Because it was incredibly hot (over 45°C/113°F), boys were swimming in the river.
as were buffaloes
On of the problems facing Sukkur is the lack of appropriate solid waste collection. Thankfully, goats and sometimes cows consume a fair amount of the organic material.

The other animal that you see a lot around is the donkey. There are many donkey carts that people will carry all manners of stuff on.
Water supply in Sukkur is not sufficient, so people have installed hand-pumps from which they draw underground water. On the picture below, you also see another classic: the open manhole (very dangerous).

In this picture, you see an ad-hoc water supplier (using a tanker) getting water from a canal in which cows are having a dip. The cows are upstream of the tanker... (sorry about the blurry motorcycle in the front, I was in a moving car).

This fire fighting equipment was seen at a petrol station.
Whereas most women in Karachi and Lahore will wear a hijab or no veil at all (one can also see a few niqabs), there is a significant number of women in Sukkur and the surrounding area who will wear yellow burqas such as the one below. I didn't see any black or blue ones. I wonder if there is a significance to the color or not. There are also very few women in the streets, as compared to Karachi or Lahore.
In addition to the old fort, Sukkur has a few nice buildings, including this mosque.
As everywhere else in the developing world, those who can afford it have a bicycle, and will ride it even in the punishing heat.

Another option for transport is these overcrowded minibuses. Without air conditioning and room to move, I think I might prefer a bicycle.
Around Sukkur, some traditional houses are made with reeds from the banks of the Indus and the many canals that criss-cross the region.
There are also dozens of brick factories such as this one. Notice the date palms in the back, which the region is famous for. Don't be fooled by the electrical wires, power is available only a few hours a day, as load shedding is prevalent (the cause of the lack of electricity appears to be in part a dispute with India over water, on which I have no opinion).
In the poorest part of Sukkur, the roads aren't paved, which leads to puddles of sewage in the streets. You can also see a small flock of goats, a donkey cart, and two tuk-tuks.

January 26, 2010

Ethiopian Airline crash

The tragic plane accident that recently occured off the coast of Lebanon (25 Jan 2010) should, one would hope, be reported on evenly in both the French and US press. Unfortunately, I was not surprised to notice the difference in reporting. Don't get me wrong: the facts are exactly the same, as is the pathos conveyed in the piece. What differs, however, is where the make of the doomed plane is mentioned.

Excerps are from the very first word in the article.

In Le Monde dated 25.01.2010 (emphasis mine) :

Un Boeing 737 d'Ethiopian Airlines avec 90 personnes à bord s'est abîmé au large du Liban, lundi 25 janvier vers 2 heures, heure locale (1 heure, heure de Paris), peu après son décollage de Beyrouth. Les équipes de secours libanaises qui participent aux recherches sur le site de l'accident avaient retrouvé dix corps lundi matin. "Jusqu'ici, nous avons retrouvé dix corps sur le site du crash au large des côtes de Naameh, [à environ 12 km] au sud de Beyrouth", a indiqué un responsable du ministère de la défense sous le couvert de l'anonymat.

see the entire article here: http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2010/01/25/catastrophe-aerienne-en-mediterrannee_1296109_3218.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the New York Times online edition, dated: January 24, 2010

An Ethiopian Airlines plane crashed into the Mediterranean Sea on Monday morning shortly after it took off from Beirut International Airport in stormy weather. Officials said that 82 passengers and 8 crew members were on board. “The flight lost contact with Lebanese air traffic controllers shortly after takeoff,” said Wogayehu Terefe, a spokeswoman for Ethiopian Airlines. She added that a rescue crew was headed to the crash site to see if anyone had survived.

Of the 90 people aboard the flight, more than half - 51 people - were Lebanese nationals. The airline also said that 23 passengers were Ethiopian. Two British nationals were also listed as passengers, and the remaining six passengers were Turkish, French, Russian, Canadian, Syrian and Iraqi nationals, the airline said. The eight crew members were Ethiopian.

The plane that crashed, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 409, was a Boeing 737 that had been scheduled to take off at 2:10 a.m., according to the company’s Web site, but it actually left at 2:35. The 1,730-mile flight to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital, was scheduled to take 4 hours and 40 minutes.

See the whole article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/world/middleeast/25crash.html?ref=world

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've long had a theory about this, namely that the French press will bury the name Airbus deep in an article while the US press will do the same with Boeing, and that the French press will lead with the name Boeing while the US press will lead with Airbus, depending on the case.

Should I be disappointed? perhaps a little bit, but I am also not surprised in the least.